No. of Recommendations: 4
More Horseshit:
Out them on trial if the Washington Examiner article you quote is accurate and guilt can be proven.
Oh, so you think this didn't happen? Lol, okay, More Horseshit.
But here’s the most important point…. You offered this example, I suppose, to prove your attempted point that leftists defend breaking things and injuring people as permissible free speech, yet nothing in the article mentions “free speech” as a defense of their behavior.
Didn't say it did, More Horseshit. I suppose your middle name is "Strawman". No, that article was to refute the board stupidity that goes that Antifa doesn't exist. Or something. You people rarely say anything concrete or definitive in your posts. It's a chickenshit means of debating, practiced by people who don't want to be held accountable for what they really believe or say. Do better.
