No. of Recommendations: 2
That last post was all for you, as it fits you perfectly.
You speak of the sanctity of courts? Boy, please.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
This Colorado thing was wrong on 50 levels, but I don't expect Non-Player Characters to understand that.
You did get 1 thing right:
This will only matter with respect to actions that swing states might take based on the high courts findings.
This was the canary in the coal mine to see how the boundaries could be pushed.
Congrats. America is weaker today because of you and your fellow travelers.
