Post #17297 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

Let's say the former. The sort of nastiness that you think Republicans should find disqualifies a candidate. In that case, would you be willing to let a Republican like De Santis have control of the Presidency, rather than the terrible Democratic candidate?

Basically you're flipping the current 'sitch'; Trump running as a Democrat versus DeSantis on the R side.

I'd go with DeSantis and trust in the American public to continue voting for candidates that are not poo-flinging agents of chaos; that absent a revenge-driven, narcissistic, compulsively lying, pandering conspiracy theorist in the Oval Office, the system will cycle back as it always does.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (49)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.