Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Sand Island, or Manzanar?
Date: 01/30/26 5:41 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Do they really intend their arrest operations to overrun the capacity to deport people by this much?

Yes.

Mostly, that's because the capacity to deport people is rather limited. There simply aren't enough immigration law judges. That's one of the reason that the hearing calendar got so backlogged, and why there are literally several millions of cases in the pipeline. There are actually fewer ILJ's today than when Trump took office, because a bunch of them were let go in 2025.

This is a problem for interior enforcement, because nearly all people who are detained for immigration violations away from the border are entitled to a hearing before deportation. Any many of the folks detained on the border that claimed asylum were entitled to one as well. Since you have millions of people who are entitled to a hearing, and nowhere to store them while they're waiting the several years for a hearing, you have to release most of them on their own recognizance until the hearing date. Similar to being out on bail awaiting your trial, and what conservatives derided as "catch and release."

So, you can go out and arrest as many people as you can - but if you don't have any more beds at your detention facilities, and if you don't have any way to speed up the deportation hearings, you just have to release them to await their hearing dates. In order to get more people through the process, you can't just increase the number of people you arrest - you need to build more detention facilities and hire more ILJ's. Which takes money. ICE didn't get that money until middle of last year, so they're finally able to start getting some more detention facilities in place. They tried using state facilities as a temporary kludge ("Alligator Alcatraz," anyone?) but the logistics of doing that drive up the expenses.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community