Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |
Author: ptheland   😊 😞
Number: of 80399 
Subject: Re: Trump Iran Deal vs Obama Deal
Date: 05/25/26 2:07 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
How about we deal in facts rather than Fox News talking points. Let's start here:

You only need a few percentage points of enrichment to make uranium go boom.

No. You need to get to 80% enrichment to make a viable weapon. In theory, as little as 20% can work, but I don't believe it has ever been proven to work.

Every additional point just means the weapon gets smaller.

That's true. The higher the enrichment level, the less uranium you need, so the bomb can get smaller.

Obama's deal left them with fairly highly enriched uranium.

No, it didn't. It capped enrichment at about 3.67%. That's enough to power a nuclear reactor, but not enough for a bomb. Nuclear reactors used to generate electricity generally need between 3% and 5% enrichment.

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (43) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds