Post #10501 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Regarding point 1:
That's just spiteful. It still doesn't change the legal situation we've been discussing. It's just "you like immigrants so much, YOU take them". Not really helpful at all.

Regarding point 2:
You gave albaby a one-line answer. He then reiterated his challenge of "what specifically would you do" regarding enforcement given the constraints he outlined. The "easy" answer is "change the constraints". But you actually have to do that first, which isn't going to happen anytime soon (which is why this has stymied us for a few decades now). Until you "change the constraints", you have to work within them. Which is -as I understood it- what albaby was challenging you with.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.