No. of Recommendations: 2
Not so. Until we get some explanations it could very easily be perfectly innocent. Elon's crew may trace disbursements, but until it's given a fair look with explanations, ya got nothing. Innuendo City. - Lambo
---------------
I think that is the correct and logical way to look at it. Questionable expenditures deserve their day in court so to speak where reasons for spending or not sending or redirecting spending can be reviewed. Hopefully much of it will be found to pass muster. It's not the $40B of good work done by USAID, it is within the other $20B where questions arise, questions that good oversight requires an answer to.
However, the issue of insubordination is quite another matter. If someone stands on some sort of personal principal that as President you don't have the right to know and should not even be asking, well that sort of arrogance means you need to resign right away before you are fired.