Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Minnesota 1, Spankee 0
Date: 02/15/26 5:00 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Do you think that the reason they aren't going after employers is simply influence in Congress? If employers pay too high a price to hire undocumented migrants, they won't do it. No jobs for them, and they won't come here (or stay here). Seems really simple, but no one in Congress is even suggesting such actions (that I'm aware of). Why?

Because they didn't like what happened when they went after employers earlier in the term.

Remember the Hyundai raid in Georgia, back in September? Caused all kinds of problems for them when their efforts ended up jeopardizing the operations of the factory. They did the same thing with farm raids, and restaurant raids, and hotel raids. ICE went big on those during the first few months of the Administration, with predictable results:

The Trump administration has abruptly shifted the focus of its mass deportation campaign, telling Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to largely pause raids and arrests in the agricultural industry, hotels and restaurants, according to an internal email and three U.S. officials with knowledge of the guidance.

The decision suggested that the scale of President Trump’s mass deportation campaign — an issue that is at the heart of his presidency — is hurting industries and constituencies that he does not want to lose.


https://archive.ph/NgpAk#selection-687.0-691.208

Trump is a very transactional, and in some ways very practical, President. He wants really strict immigration enforcement, but if it starts to have outcomes that hurt him or hurt the constituencies he cares about not losing, he will jettison ideological purity in a New York minute. So it's not so much that Big Ag or Big Hotel or Big Restaurant has influence in Congress (which of course they also do), but because Trump doesn't want to be seen specifically targeting businesses in a way that he will get blowback for.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (36) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community