Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: AOC’s thoughts on Taiwan
Date: 02/18/26 12:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
You need to spend more time with politicians.

Oh, dear god no. I spend far too much time with politicians. A ton of time with politicians, for my sins.

Certainly enough time to know that you absolutely cannot judge whether a politician is smart or not from watching them speak in public, or what they do on TV. There's no way you can assess that. I've known politicians that were as smart as a whip (in the conventional sense) in the conference room, but sounded like a box of rocks when giving a speech or declaiming from the Commission dais. I've been with politicians that appeared dull as dust in public, but were scintillating with charisma one-on-one (Michael Dukakis was the prime example, but Al Gore was similar).

Nearly all successful politicians have enormous people skills. Many people tend not to regard that as an aspect of intelligence. I happen to think it is very much an aspect of intelligence - it's a purely mental set of abilities that require insight, intuition, and reactive capabilities. There are plenty of folks with high logic/reading intelligence that tend to minimize those skills - and our general conception of what being "smart" is follows that shape. We'll take a completely asocial math nerd and label them a genius, but take the guy who can walk into a room and win everyone over in the space of 20 minutes as just "the ability to be relatable" or "affable," even though that's an extraordinary thing to be able to do that just uses your mental talents.

If you end up spending a lot of time with politicians, you'll realize that most of them that are at all successful have immense talents that don't map onto Mensa exams but are signs of incredible mental acuity.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community