Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Oklahoma and Massachusetts
Date: 11/19/24 7:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
How could they possibly do this? According to you, voters merely make suggestions and unless the law changes, nothing changes.

Because voters don't merely make suggestions. Who the President is matters, even though the President is not the sole person that the Executive agencies are accountable to. The President gets to direct a lot of policy - he's just not unconstrained, and staff is also accountable both to Congress and to private parties enforcing the law. That's why I keep pressing you to give me an example of an instance in the various agencies like EPA or Labor or Interior or Energy where the career staff just decided to "subvert" the President, rather than (say) conform to legitimate requirements of the APA or the oversight of Congressional committees or what have you.

But to clarify - when I say that if Trump sticks to it "they'll get the money," I meant from Congress. The GOP will do their Budget/Reconciliation package in early to mid summer. If Trump insists, you'll have funding in there to fund the staffing and construction costs for building new detention centers. A real "mass deportation" would probably require several tens of billions over the budget period - but if that's his main ask on the spending side, I think it's something he'll get.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community