Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: ICE promises....
Date: 01/29/26 11:14 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Noem and Bovino have always insisted they were conducting a "targeted operation to seize a violent criminal", so is this a real change, or PR?

It will probably be a real change in Minnesota. There has long been a schism within the Administration on what the immigrations strategy should be WRT non-criminal illegal aliens. Noem and Bovino have been in the "get everybody" camp, while Homan has leaned more towards "target the worst ones" camp.

Here's the thing to remember - the "enhanced operations" in Minnesota weren't going to make those communities safer or get more violent criminal aliens out. If they were designed to do that, and effective in doing that, then they would be going to red states or to communities that have larger numbers of illegal aliens. Red states would want them if they were good for the community, and the Administration would have doled them out as rewards for supporters rather than punitively against communities that didn't vote for him. And if they were good at catching a larger proportion of aliens, they would have been deployed in the areas where there are vastly more aliens (like Texas or Florida or Georgia or Arizona).

Because of how they were deployed, we know that the "enhanced operations" were intended to serve purposes other than catching a lot of unauthorized aliens. The Administration seems genuinely convinced that these tactics are not achieving those intended effects - or at least are causing enough backlash that it's not worth continuing them in this manner.

If they only arrest actual criminals, instead of every brown person who doesn't have his "papers" on him at the moment, how are they going to generate the big numbers that MAGA wants to see?

Well, that's the question - is this just a change in tactics in Minnesota, or nationwide? Minnesota doesn't have all that many unauthorized immigrants. It's not even in the top 10. The national numbers are going to be determined by what ICE does in CA, NY, FL, NJ, IL, NY, and the other states that have much larger unauthorized populations. If ICE nationally were to start targeting their operations to only immigrants with criminal records, they are not going to be able to generate the big numbers of arrests that MAGA wants to see.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community