Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: About Iran’s Navy “At the Bottom of the Sea”
Date: 04/28/26 3:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
That's how these things work. The small, outgunned guerilla force engages in asymmetric warfare - which forces the larger invading country to expend vast amounts of resources (manpower, material, economic resources) without being able to actually "win" their strategic goals. And they do that until the domestic cost of maintaining that fight is too high. They choose to leave because the domestic political pressure forces them to do something they are not physically forced to do.

Yes. This is the textbook example of asymmetric warfare. A lot of times people draw the wrong conclusions from it, though.

Same thing here. Iran's going to throttle the strait and precipitate one of the worst energy crises in history, together with shortages in fertilizer and helium and other goods that have to go through the strait.

Hmm. You'd think that would be enough to motivate certain European countries to not want to be in a position where a collection of nutjobs can hold them hostage at whim, but maybe not. We're not talking about your father's Brits, Germans and French (actually here you'd have to go way back something like 5 generations to find some Napoleon-era French guys).

It's possible they never restart - but then again, this isn't the first time Iran's had to close down many of their wells, and they will likely close them down based upon their likely resilience. And then rotate among them. And if that doesn't work, then they'll have lost some of their wells.

And will that help or hurt their economy?

Doesn't mean we get what we want. It means we've hurt them, perhaps permanently, but if they still resist we still don't get what we want. What happens if they keep resisting?

I suppose they could all fish.

About 700 million barrels per day, as of last year.

I think your estimate is a bit high :)

What happens if they keep resisting?

Then domestic pressure on Trump in the form of the democrat party essentially rooting for an American humiliation grows. That's what the Iranians are counting on. Bush43 held firm; we'll see what Trump does. The democrats don't have unlimited cards to play, though.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community