Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Big Changes in Sports
Date: 06/08/24 5:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
The other issue is the entrance of private equity into sports ownership.

-------------------------

Makes all the sense in the world, from past history, doesn't it?

There is already an unconscionable / obscene amount of money flowing INTO professional sports from willing consumers and unwilling / misled taxpayers in the form of exhorbitant ticket prices and twenty year tax giveaways for stadiums costing from $1.5 billion to $6.4 billion or higher. If there is any possible way to find a way to transfer MORE of these funds away from the public into the hands of the wealthiest tenth of a tenth of a percent in the country, we can count on the private equity "business model" to find a way or die trying.

Of course, one mismatch between this new scheme and current reality is that pro sports already do not match the model in retail, restaurants, hospitals and nursing homes already exploited by PE. In those industries, PE bought firms that owned the real estate of their point of delivery to "customers", conducted a bunch of paper shuffles that sold the real estate to a separate firm then obligated the PE-controlled business to lease the space back from the separate REIT at inflated rates, shifting more money out of the soon-to-be zombie firm into the pockets of REIT owners.

In pro sports, owners figured that scam out thirty years ago. I'm pretty sure there hasn't been a SINGLE stadium in ANY sport built exclusively with team owner or even private money. I'm not even sure a single stadium has been built in the last thirty years with more than even 20% owner/private money. Taxpayers are already holding the bag on probably 80% of the cost of all stadiums in use. No opportunity for further shifting of liabilities possible there.

WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community