Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤ | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤ | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 77831 
Subject: Re: Well, This Seems Insane
Date: 07/01/24 11:35 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
Nixon called from the grave: he wants his tapes back.



Motion denied. The specific context of the tapes being released to Jaworski wasn't a criminal prosecution of Nixon, but instead of the "Watergate Seven" (H. R. Haldeman, John Ehrlichman, John N. Mitchell, Charles Colson, Gordon C. Strachan, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson). The issue involved in U.S. v. Nixon was executive privilege (is the evidence protected from disclosure?), not whether Nixon was indictable or whether the evidence would have been admissible in a prosecution against him.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds