Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: ges ✧✺  😊 😞
Number: of 88911 
Subject: Our adolescent Defense Secretary
Date: 03/29/25 8:47 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
That's how Hegseth comes across.

If you feel comfortable having this inexperienced and incompetent fool in charge of our military, you are not paying attention.

Damn the Republican Senate for allowing Trump to infest our government with nothing but incompetent ass-kissers.

Pete Hegseth
What about firing this guy? No?

While Waltz committed the original sin of inviting the wrong dude to a sensitive group chat, it was Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth who most abused the thread. The demeanor in the chat of Hegseth, until recently a weekend cable news host, is one of insecurity; here’s a guy who wants to show off how many acronyms and proper nouns he knows. This leads him down a path, one that ends with him sharing specific operational details in advance of the attack outside a secure channel. Hegseth, along with other members of the administration, has been arguing that nothing in the chat was “classified information.” That is just as laughable as Waltz claiming that Goldberg digitally apparated himself into the chat. If specific attack plans ahead of an attack are not classified, then what is? This is not Hegseth’s first screwup, and it won’t be the last. The screwups will continue to be tolerated, too, because neither the White House nor the Senate Republicans who put their reputations on the line to confirm him are ready to acknowledge that their critics may have had a point. He’s not going anywhere.
Slate's The Surge
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ges here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy