Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: More on keeping Biden
Date: 07/02/24 1:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
I'm sure some of you have heard of The Keys to the White House, a system developed by Allan Lichtman back in 1981 to predict the winners of presidential elections in the US. There are 13 items, called keys, to consider, each giving a true or false answer. With 5 or fewer false answers, the incumbent party's nominee is predicted to win. Six or more false answers and the challenging party's nominee is predicted to win. He has a pretty good track record since the system was developed, getting only one election wrong.

You can read all of the gory details at the wikipedia page here:
en.wikipedia.org - The Keys to the White House
Scroll down to just below the middle of the page where there is a big block of color. The current race is listed at the bottom of that block, with the prior races above that.

The bottom line is that with Biden as the nominee, his system predicts Biden as the winner. With someone other than Biden as the nominee, the system predicts that replacement will lose. As it stands now, four of the tests give false answers. With a replacement, two more tests turn false and Trump is the predicted winner.

I'm going to grant up front that there are multiple criticisms of this system - including some that would be familiar to those who have studied mechanical investing. But - to use mechanical investing terms - the post-discovery record is pretty good.

So here's yet another reason to stick with Biden. (Along with a bit of evidence that my half-eaten ham sandwich could beat Trump, but only if it were already the sitting president.)

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community