Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88943 
Subject: Re: Vivek: Mass Layoffs Needed
Date: 08/21/23 12:26 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
But it is reasonable that a large number could be eliminated over the course of one or two terms as president.

"Could be?" Sure. But it would never happen - because most federal employees are doing jobs that most people approve of.

The largest federal employers, by a mile and more, are the defense agencies (Veteran's Affairs, Army, Navy, Air Force, Homeland Security, DoD proper). Percentages vary, depending on whether you look at civilian vs. all employment (about 70% of federal employees are in those agencies, and about 36% of civilian employees are) and whether you include the Post Office in these discussions (USPS has about 600K employees, which is enormous). These figures are from 2019, but won't have changed much. The largest single federal agency by civilian employment is either USPS (if you count it) or Veteran's Affairs (if you don't).

ourpublicservice.org - FedFigures Workforce

It's hard to imagine Republicans being willing to take an axe - or even a scalpel - to those defense-related agencies. Indeed, there's a huge contingent in the party that has been pressing to increase defense funding, and presumably wouldn't take too kindly to RIF measures depleting their overall employment levels. Most of the agencies that Republicans/conservatives generally disfavor (HUD, Labor, Education, certain parts of HHS) just don't have that many employees, relative to the overall size of government.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy