Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: g0177325 ⎊✺🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 88909 
Subject: Re: AI: Better an empty lot than a data center
Date: 11/10/26 4:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Not successfully. These things are massive, and it's very hard to create noise buffers even for far quieter uses than datacenters.

So what's the solution for datacenters? I think that like it or not, AI will be a huge part of the future exponential advancement of civilization (provided it doesn't kill us all first!).

Based on this discussion, it seems obvious that datacenters should only be built on unpopulated land. There'a lot of that in the U.S., in the form of deserts, mountainous regions, and large swaths of Alaska. But a lot of that is protected by legislation for valid landmark, cultural, national treasure, and environmental reasons (which the Trump admin is trying hard to circumvent).

Deserts are probably too hot for datacenter cooling needs, and mountains are too hard to build on.

So what about Alaska? There must be flatter areas that could be used, and that are devoid of people to be impacted.

And then there's Canada with all those huge cold unpopulated areas. Maybe it's time to "make a deal" with Canada to host U.S. data centers?

As for powering datacenters, why not pass legislation to require them to "bring their own power" in the form of clean "green" solutions like solar, wind, geothermal, or small modular nuclear reactors.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to g0177325 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy