Post #36557 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

No, I'm really curious as to your examples of how you think law-enforcement related transpo flights are handled. Do you think these guys - convicted criminals, all - are flown in luxury accommodations routinely?

Of course they're not flown in "luxury accommodations," as well you know. But they aren't flown in military aircraft, as a general matter. Again, unless you have some actual examples of Colombia being okay with us switching military aircraft in for formerly civilian transportation? Otherwise, it sounds like this was a relatively reasonable matter for them to raise as a concern, and a reasonable response would have been to have a conversation and use civilian aircraft while we work it out - rather than have the President unilaterally impose massive tariffs over it.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (216)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.