Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: marco100   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: More on the DOJ lawyer in MN
Date: 02/10/26 7:33 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Actually, the judge sounds incompetent. Although Le is obviously also incompetent.

All of these District Court judges trying to micromanage ICE operations are going to get overturned if the cases ever get reviewed on appeal.

It's not the place of District Court judges to micromanage federal agencies. Separation of powers applies.

If a judge wants to issue a valid, enforceable order, it has to be specific enough so that it can actually be enforced.

I didn't see anything in the article linked explaining what if anything the judge actually DID other than make snarky remarks.

Was there anything in the article pertaining to the specific reason that Ms. Le was in court in the first place?

I didn't see it.

There are many different ways a judge has to enforce his or her orders. But they have to be legal orders.

Boasberg had this problem too.

Court is not the place for these judges to politically posture and they need to stop doing that.

If a litigant comes into court seeking relief, and the judge finds cause to grant that relief, then the judge should issue an order reflecting that, as well as including some sanctions for violation of that order.

This is very commonplace in most litigation--"Your client must be present to be deposed by such and such specific date or his/her case will be dismissed." Etc.

When you mix a judge like this with a hysterical incompetent attorney for the government (who clearly acted unethically, as the judge himself noted), you're not going to get a clear idea of what the problem actually is, much less any workable solutions.

Basically Ms. Le came into court and said "My job sucks."

Well, yeah, hundreds of thousands of lawyers every day could walk into courtrooms around the country and make similarly valid statements.

The marginally competent ones don't.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to marco100 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community