Post #1095 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Assuming you have some creative way of sidestepping that pesky statute of limitations.

Ah - but he has. He has the argument that the misdemeanors were committed in furtherance of another crime.

But for the fact that Trump committed the misdemeanor, this is an easy and rather quick motion to dismiss. Which is why if Trump hadn't committed the misdemeanors, there would have been no indictment. But because Trump committed the misdemeanor, Bragg has an indictment that won't be instantly dismissed. He might ultimately lose on the point, but it's at least a colorable argument.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (114)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.