Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: ges 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: Origin of the shadow docket
Date: 04/18/26 9:49 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
From the comments:

Lawyer here. I am outraged to find out how partisan Justice Roberts is behind closed doors acting in his official — supposedly neutral — position as a Supreme Court justice. The justices of the past decade have made their politics rather obvious, but to find out how blatantly they were wielding their authority to block President Obama, who was democratically elected, and ARE wielding it to assist Trump, is enraging. They are destroying the judicial branch of our government. After reading this I lay much more blame for the divisions in our country and the destruction we are witnessing at the feet of the right wing of the Supreme Court.

This is incredibly important news that goes to the very fabric of our democracy. I hope that bringing these memos to light generates the outrage the Court deserves. I’m sure the lower federal court judges are shocked to their cores to learn how little the Court cares for their well-reasoned decisions of the past 15 months. This will really rock our judicial system.


Yep.

What struck me most was this line in a Roberts’ memo:
“Speed was vital, he said, because environmental regulation was going to be very expensive for states and the power industry. The sums involved could approach $480 billion, he asserted, and industry groups would have to start preparations immediately.”
In my opinion, Roberts here is clearly repeating what lobbyists from the industry have told him.

And it also strikes me how he says “it would be the most expensive regulation ever imposed on the power sector,” and too big, costly and consequential for the court not to act immediately.”
We are talking here about the most consequential and urgent crisis our planet is facing, and we have known that for decades, and a few justices find the impact on industry more urgent.
And here we are: floods, hurricanes, warming seas.


and...Yep.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ges here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community