Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Government deported a U.S. citizen with no process
Date: 04/28/25 4:24 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 20
What we did is remove children with their mothers who requested it - that's a parental decision.

No, Dope. That is a lie. They did NOT give her a choice. Her attorney claims that ICE did not allow her to communicate with the child's father and make a joint parental decision about where the child should be. They actively stopped that conversation when it began to happen. The attorney also claims that ICE asked her to write the letter under the threat of separating the mother from the child with no indication of what would happen to the child - no guarantee that the child would be delivered to the father. Further, they actively kept the mother from getting legal counsel - which loops back to the due process issues the Trump administration has been blatantly violating.

I'll tell you what - if we DIDN'T do it, the story today would be, 'Trump administration's separating families again!

More lies. They DID separate families. They separated the child from her father and did not allow the father to choose to retain custody of the child in the US.

I don't know why you continue to defend the indefensible. This is why you continually get accused of being in a cult. You can't acknowledge information that is contrary to your preferred ideas.

I stand by my statement. Cruelty is the point. I can think of nothing more cruel than making a mother choose to be separated from her child with no idea what is going to happen to the child.

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community