Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: The US used its own 'Dark Fleet'
Date: 06/11/26 1:57 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 9
The media and this board declared operation Freedom or whatever it was called a failure before it started. Looks like it wasn't - what nobody saw coming was the Navy has evidently deployed a fair number of autonomous warships and drones and they're using them as escorts.

There is no siege in history that has been 100% effective. We got convoys through the Atlantic in World War II in spite of the wolf-packs. Japan managed to keep itself supplied even though we have mastery in the Pacific for the last two years of that war.

Israel’s siege of the Gaza Strip was pretty effective, yet failed to achieve its goals. Russia has tried siege tactics in several Ukrainian cities, yet they still stand - and fight. Not to put too fine a point on it, but all the might of the Federal Government couldn’t stop the flow of liquor coming in from Canada during Prohibition, or marijuana from Mexico during the 1970’s.

Any siege that cuts off 97-98% of intended traffic has to be a great success, yet here we are with almost no oil (comparitively) flowing through the Strait, and threats entirely ineffective (and likely to produce worse results if Iran targets neighboring countries’ oil infrastructure - as they have already shown a willingness and ability to do.)

This is a loss. It’s a loss because Trump and Hegseth are wedded to the “me have big guns, therefore you lose” mindset, and that’s not how it always (or even frequently) plays out. See: Afghanistan (both the US and Russia). Vietnam (both the US and France). Ukraine. There are lots more throughout history. The Spanish Empire didn’t collapse for lack of guns, nor the Ottoman, nor lots of others.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community