Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (74) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: 'NEVER SURRENDER'
Date: 08/26/23 8:52 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Dope1: Yeah, we've never had any losing Presidential candidate engage in lawfare to try to overturn an election. Has never happened in the United States. We've just never seen anything like this. At all. Ever.

Sure, Trump had every right to take his evidence to court and try to overturn a fraudulent election. He filed more than 60 lawsuits and lost every single one but one. And why did he lose? Either, he didn't have standing or he did not present any evidence, because there was no evidence.

In the past, after going to court and losing, every other candidate conceded their loss and moved on. Team Trump set up a false electors conspiracy and planned in insurrection.


Dope1: The correct word is "religiously", because it's now NPC gospel that Trump must be guilt of FREAKING SOMETHING SOMEHOW SOMEWHERE and you're just going to get him.

In the documents case, even Trump admits he took the documents, many marked at the highest classification levels (you have repeatedly insisted that Clinton needed to be indicted and imprisoned for having less sensitive documents on her server). He just claims they're his, not America's.

In each of the other cases substantial evidence of crimes was presented and grand juries felt there was sufficient evidence to warrant indictments. Now it's up to prosecutors to prove their cases.

Welcome to America.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (74) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community