Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: The TACOrettes keep coming
Date: 05/19/26 12:27 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
The Strait is closed. That was the objective.

No, it wasn't.

I know you have this theory that Trump wanted oil prices to rise sharply, but I think that's false. Trump doesn't benefit from high oil prices, and he doesn't care whether oil companies do. His personal grift is in making lots of deals in the fantabulously wealthy Gulf states, along with all kinds of other financial and crypto and other shenanigans. He doesn't play in the oil patch and doesn't have a stake in it. And he's not in the business of making other people money, whether they donate to his campaigns or not. And high gas prices are poison to his popularity, and he knows that. There's no reason at all that Trump or his administration would want higher oil prices.

Everything about the prosecution and discussion of this war indicates that they thought it would be a low-cost and quick win. They thought it would be Venezuela 2.0. They'd hit leadership and create an opening for a more pliant junior person to take charge, blow up a bunch of crap so that the pliant person would have sufficient motivation/cover to bend the knee, and then the knee would be bent. That's why they kept predicting a 4-6 week timetable, and why they kept insisting they were on schedule with that 4-6 week timetable. They never would have done that if they even anticipated - much less intended - the Strait to be closed for any length of time.

It's always more comforting to think that things are going to plan, even if the plan is terrible (I think that was the Joker in TDK, but I can't remember). But that's not what's happening here. This is an unintended outcome, not the objective.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community