Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84353 
Subject: Re: Starmer chooses his side: Iran
Date: 02/20/26 5:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
As I said. It's not unlike the high school cheerleader who thinks she needs to run through the senior class so that people like her.

Yes, it is unlike that. We have had good, solid reciprocal economic and military relationships with our allies that vastly inured to our benefit for decades. We got to set up the entire world economy, and to design it to our benefit. We got to assume unparalleled dominance in military affairs, and therefore got to the be the guiding hand in international relations for decades. Being "The Leader of the Free World" came with massive benefits for the United States, not just costs.

Mutually beneficial relationships - not "running through" the senior class so that people will like you. That's not what our 80-year economic and military alliances with the other western democratic advanced economies have been like. In your metaphor, it would be like having a lot of good, close friends that you had been close to ever since you were in kindergarten....and then deciding that your friends are holding you back, so you start shaking them off. That can be either a good move or a bad move, depending on whether these were in fact good friends or not. But there's pros and cons to ditching your longtime friends.

One of the consequences is that once you start shaking them off and treating them like rivals rather than friends, they're far less likely to do favors for you. So if you call them up and ask them for something, they might tell you to buzz off.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community