Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84350 
Subject: LA Times Refuses to Endorse a Candidate
Date: 10/23/24 9:04 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 18
The LA Times announced it would not publish an editorial endorsing any candidate for President. In response, Mariel Garza, the editor of the newspaper's editorial page, promptly resigned in protest, stating:

"The non-endorsement undermines the integrity of the editorial board and every single endorsement we make, down to school board races. People will justifiably wonder if each endorsement was a decision made by a group of journalists after extensive research and discussion, or through decree by the owner."

That owner is Patrick Soon-Shiong, a surgeon / investor / businessman worth about $6 billion according to Wikipedia.

He's too rich to care if the LA Times goes out of businesss if subscribers abandon the paper in protest so it's hard to imagine any financial pressure that could be applied to alter this kind of thinking. Clearly shame doesn't apply if you cannot be persuaded to make a stand with a contrast as start as Harris versus Trump.

This is a fascinating illustration of the illusion that money buys independence and freedom. The illusion that money gives you lattitude to speak truth to power and not worry about your day to day existance being at risk. Given the behavior of many of America's multi-millionaires and billionaires, it seems a significant fraction haven't become more FREE with their limitless money. Instead, they've become more psychologically dependent upon it and more fearful of losing ANY of it, even if losing 99% of it still leaves them a multi-millionaire.

People like this are not hooked up right. Yet people like this are in control of the majority of media and "social network" platforms that are consistently warping virtually all information we take in to understand "reality." Why anyone in "steerage" (anyone worth less than a mere $10 million) would be allowing people this disconnected from reality to affect their positions is utterly baffling.


WTH

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community