Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Bolton Indicted
Date: 10/17/25 2:26 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 15
We've had Presidents sic various departments on their political enemies. We've also had Presidents give speeches and label half the country as political enemies.

But never the formal power of the prosecutorial arm of the government. That's different. There's a reason why nearly every state doesn't let their Governor oversee actual prosecutions, having an independently elected AG.

I'm beyond sick of the NaziHitler crap and am going to dismiss those who bring it up as morons.

That's your prerogative, but you should at least understand that when people bring it up they're not comparing the current Administration's policies as being NaziHitler circa 1938, but NaziHitler circa 1929. The "rise to power" part of Nazi Germany, where the Nazis converted Germany away from a liberal (small-l) "rule of law" society into an authoritarian society where all governmental decisions revolved around a single person and party.

The dissolution of German rule of law didn't happen in a day. It was a long, gradual descent marked by eliminating barriers to authoritarian power one at a time.

People are right to be troubled by the gradual descent into illiberalism we're experience in the U.S., and indeed many other countries. To quote another discussion on the point, liberal democracy depends on a shared belief in individual rights, equality of all citizens, and the rule of law. It can only function if the major political factions don't behave as if they have a monopoly on the truth or a right to power. Illiberal actors think they have both.

I agree that folks tend to ignore the distinctions between actions being illiberal, anti-democratic, authoritarian, or illegal. A lot of what Trump does is illiberal (meaning the conservative sense of small "l" liberal) without being authoritarian or illegal or anti-democratic. That doesn't make people who use the wrong label "morons," and I think you do yourself a disservice in not trying to understand what points are actually being made.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community