Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: AOC’s thoughts on Taiwan
Date: 02/17/26 5:55 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Yes, she clearly failed to be adequately prepared. If the goal was to show that she has foreign policy chops, that was a blunder.

She also proceeded to lay waste to any notion that she's well versed in geography, history or economic, her chosen field.

Talk about going 4 for 4.

But part of becoming a Les Aspin or a Sam Nunn or whomever is starting off green. Everyone starts off new to foreign policy at some point. Everyone who aspires to a job that involves going to national security conferences will have their first non-trivial role in a national security conference. Everyone has to learn how to do the job(s) they want to eventually do. She's just turned 36. If she one day wants to have a role in a field that involves having more national security expertise, she's got tons of time to do it - and she'll have to start off new and raw, and she's going to make flubs.

Sure. Every one of the people I mentioned did something foreign policy related or at least was in the room prior to joining the House Of Representatives. AOC never had anything like that. She's never been on any significant piece of legislation, never served on any of the foreign-policy facing committees in the House and has never served in a leadership position.

In fact, this just makes the whole episode worse. If she was going there to establish some credibility and lay down a marker to show that she can hang in that environment, she pretty much face planted.

So, again - this doesn't mean she's dumb. It doesn't mean she's an idiot. It just means she tried to do something without being completely prepared to do it well.

If by "without being completely prepared" you mean "coming off as completely ignorant on multiple fronts", then I agree.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community