Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |
Author: tedthedog   😊 😞
Number: of 84352 
Subject: ex-US Defense Contractors
Date: 04/06/25 10:57 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
I posted the following as part of a comment on another board, it seems more appropriate on this board.

The investing thesis is that given U.S. actions and policy changes, there will be increased defense spending in the EU and NATO/exU.S. countries. The idea of investing in EU and NATO/exU.S. defense contractors, given these crazy times, doesn't at first thought raise any red flags for me (who knows, it might later). Also, everyone is different.

I've narrowed my list of ex-U.S. defense contractors, available via ADR, to the following for further analysis.

BAE Systems plc BAESY (England)
Thales.S.A THLLY (France)
Leonardo S.p.a. FINMY (Italy)

BAESY is the most prominent, but apparently has large U.S. contracts so that complicates things, while THLLY and FINMY are apparently much less exposed to U.S. contracting. I say "apparently" because I never trust chatGPT until I manually verify what it says with a reference. I don't know if this direction will pan out, but the thesis is that defense contracting within EU and NATO/ex-US using non-U.S. companies will increase rather sharply. I've since searched a bit more, and added a couple more candidates.

Someone asked "Why restrict to ADRs?" and my answer was that I simply haven't used overseas brokers before, so am taking it one step at at a time.
I also found out the following about Schwab (cut and pasted from their page):


The Schwab Global Account provides real-time quotes during foreign market hours and multi-currency statement reporting, offering better insights into international investments.
Schwab One lacks these features, as it primarily operates in U.S. dollars.
No Account Minimums or Maintenance Fees:
There are no minimums or maintenance fees for the Schwab Global Account, making it accessible to a wide range of investors.
Suitability
The Schwab Global Account is ideal for investors who prefer independent online trading and want direct exposure to foreign markets in local currencies.
(tedthedog note: just the following twelve markets)
Australia (Australian Dollar)
Belgium (Euro)
Canada (Canadian Dollar)
Finland (Euro)
France (Euro)
Germany (Euro)
Hong Kong (Hong Kong Dollar)
Italy (Euro)
Japan (Japanese Yen)
Netherlands (Euro)
Norway (Norwegian Krone)
United Kingdom (British Pound).
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to tedthedog here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 562 posts about Non-US Stocks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
Greggs PLC (GRG.L) · 20 recs · 2025
Topicus: Not Constellation · 16 recs · 2026
Unite Group (UTG), UK, falling knife. · 13 recs · 2025
SKAN · 11 recs · 2025
MELI - Brazilian darling · 10 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (5) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community