Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |
Author: ptheland 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Why didn't judge Merchan impose a fine?
Date: 01/10/25 3:22 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
That presents all kinds of issues. Can a court impose a sentence on a President-elect that would give the court continuing power to throw him in jail once he takes office? Marchan probably doesn't have the power to sever that ability from himself - if he sentences Trump to any fine, he automatically is giving himself that continuing enforcement jurisdiction until the sentence is fully served.

How about a fine that isn't payable until January 21, 2029?

Yes, technically that would continue to give the NY courts power over Trump during his presidency. But there is nothing that could actually trigger that power until after he is out of office. He can't violate the order, since the order doesn't require any action while he is President. Hopefully, it would trigger the convict's appeal rights just as this no-punishment sentence does.

Or in a similar vein, how about a sentence that requires a certain number of hours of public service - as is commonly done. Merchan could even specifically agree that serving in an elected office would satisfy that service. Again, technically leaves the court with power, but really hard to have a violation that would trigger the power.

--Peter
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to ptheland here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (55) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community