Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: bighairymike   😊 😞
Number: of 48485 
Subject: Re: A Tribe of Dorfs...
Date: 03/04/2024 10:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
More directly stated: Today’s ruling reads the 14th Amendment to mean that 1/2 of EITHER the House OR the Senate can, just by INACTION, permit an oath-breaking insurrectionist to hold office — even though Section 3 says it takes 2/3 of BOTH the House & the Senate to lift that ban -Lapsody

--------------------------

Yes sir, that is the point. It should take the highest level of consensus to prevent an elected president from taking office. It is appropriate that a really high bar is required, surely you agree with that.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds