Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: For the debate
Date: 09/09/24 2:01 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
With the current SCOTUS, talking gun control is not productive.

---------------------------

With the current SCOTUS, talking abortion is not as productive as one might first think. I mentioned this during the DNC. There is no way a federal law will be passed re-instating abortion rights in all 50 states even if Harris wins the Presidency and the Democrats win both the House and Senate. Why?

1) It will still require 60% control of the Senate to block a filibuster of 
any proposed abortion rights bill.
2) Even if Democrates win 60% control of the Senate, any law passed and signed
will be IMMEDIATELY appealed through the courts all the way to the SCOTUS
whose 6-3 fringe conservative majority will overturn the law as unconstitutional.
3) Overcoming THAT barrier will require either:
a) packing the court by adding at least four new justices
b) a constitutional amendment which requires
i) a 2/3rds vote in the House and Senate to initiate OR
ii) 2/3rds of state legislatures to initiate
iii) 3/4ths of states to approve (38 of 50)

And remember, option (3a) would also require control of 60% of the Senate otherwise Republicans will just filibuster every SCOTUS nominee and refuse to fill the new seats.

Politicians and the public have utterly failed to grasp or explain how far back the Dobbs rulling set abortion rights in the country. If abortion comes up in the debate, THIS is the point that Harris needs to make in order to promote not only turnout to vote for her, but unprecedented turnout to vote for Democrates up and down the ballot in races not even thought to be contested right now. Otherwise, nothing will change at the national level with abortion rights and the related reproductive care calamity Dobbs has created. NOTHING.

WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community