No. of Recommendations: 7
You guys are all making the same mistake: you're assuming that the status quo is acceptable. It isn't, not if anyone is serious about confronting China in 2027+.
I'm not assuming that the status quo is acceptable to us. I was just wondering why Greenland would have to accommodate our national security interests in their policy decisions, rather than pursuing a "Greenland First" policy? If it's in their national interest to help us confront China, they'll do that. If it's not, why would we have an expectation that they would put America's interests ahead of Greenland's?
