Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Texiera on what the d's should do
Date: 03/25/2025 3:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
No, I said it wasn't an authorized app to use for the transmittal of classified or national defense information. No version of it is. You can discuss unclassified, unrestricted "government business" on anything - even a pay phone. But you can't transmit this kind of information over

What's "this" level? Evidently it wasn't classified.

It's unfathomable that the information described in the Atlantic article would not be considered classified information.

That's up to the classifying authority to determine. Would you care to guess who that is in this case?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds