Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84364 
Subject: Re: The TACOrettes keep coming
Date: 05/20/26 1:24 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
Ahmadinejad was their pick for a pliable front man?

Dumb, I know. Perhaps they thought that because he was in opposition with a lot of the key folks in the current leadership, and on the outs, that he would be grateful/willing to cut a deal in order to find his way back into power. No evidence that it ever got locked down in an agreement, but that's what they might have been going for.

I think it's more likely that they had a number of folks that they believed would seize power in the event of a leadership vacuum, and who they believed would be willing to cut some sort of deal rather than be in the Assassination Chair. They clearly had a bunch of folks that they were expecting to be the contenders after Khameini was dead, but whom they ended up killing in that very first wave of strikes.

The goal was not to end up with a new leadership that was just as resolute in opposing the U.S. as the prior one, resulting in the Strait being closed and remaining closed and Iran having their hand around the neck of our Gulf state partners with the threat of bombing their energy infrastructure. That's what ended up happening. But that absolutely was not what they wanted to happen, because it's so completely terrible for the Administration in every way.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (60) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community