"And the reason it happened was because in 2020, the MSM and the Left and the Democommies made it very very clear that political violence in service of a cause thought to be "just" was not only O.K., it was obligatory.

To marco the ignored:

Th nefster tells us there were 10,300 BLM demonstrations in 2700 locations in 2020 alone. 93% were peaceful. There were some 60-80 car incidents with your buddies driving into crowds.

"The Justice Department quietly removed (9-25)from its website a study showing far-right extremists were responsible for the bulk of ideologically motivated deaths — a move that comes as the GOP seeks to back claims from President Trump that the “radical left” poses a
greater danger than the right wing.

The 2024 study, in which several criminal justice researchers reviewed National Institute of Justice data, found far more instances of deaths credited to right-wing groups. The study was still available on the Justice Department website last week, but a researcher
on extremism posted on social media that it had been removed in the days after the killing of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk.

“The number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism,” the study says. “Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives,” the study states.“In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.” ( Per this study y'all committed 666% more ideologically motivated murders than the left did, marco. Got that? But you will be back in a couple of hours saying the same thing.)

The removal of the study was first reported Tuesday by 404 Media, which credited Daniel Malmer, a Ph.D. student at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who is studying extremism, with first noticing the removal of the study Sept. 13. In a post on social media, Malmer said the study had been visible the day before. The Justice Department did not respond to request for comment on the removal of the study,
but the page now says the department is “reviewing its websites … in accordance with recent Executive Orders.”
It’s not clear which executive orders would require such action."

U.S. Congress: PDF document