Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |
Author: Dope1 ⎊  😊 😞
Number: of 88930 
Subject: Re: Another Monster Jobs Report
Date: 06/11/24 5:46 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
You've been proven wrong on this.

Speaker Johnson told his caucus on January 13th the bill was a nonstarter. Here's the link again:
thehill.com - Border bill senate speaker johnson opposition

Johnson reportedly told his members on a conference call over the weekend that the border cannot be secured without a Republican in the White House, and Saturday circulated a Fox News display laying out what it believed to be in the bill and said he would “absolutely not” accept that package.

This article was dated January 17, a Wednesday. The Saturday mentioned in the article refers to January 13.

If the republicans had felt they would have had overwhelming bipartisan opposition to that bill, they would have brought it to the floor in a heartbeat because that kind of lack of support for president Biden by his own party would have been an enormous embarrassment for him in an election year.

No, just the opposite. By bringing the bill the to the floor Johnson indicates a willingness to accept the premise the Senate democrats put forth and by doing so opens the door to negotiating things like how many illegals do we let in a day between Ports of Entry. Since he wasn't going to accept the baseline premises of the bill on their face, he wasn't going to bother with it.

On the contrary, republicans -- who frequently don't know how to count votes -- were afraid of going on record voting "no" on a bill endorsed by the National Border Patrol Council, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Wall Street Journal editorial page and supported by 66% of Americans.

That bill was going to fail in the Senate anyway, and it did. More than once:

politico.com - Senate border vote schumer biden executive action
The border policy package was the product of bipartisan negotiations between Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Kyrsten Sinema (I-Ariz.) and James Lankford (R-Okla.) last winter. It was originally tied to aid for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan, but foreign aid passed independent of border provisions after the first vote on the deal failed. Murphy reintroduced the border package as a standalone bill this month.

Several senators flipped to vote against the legislation this time around, including Sinema, Lankford and Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Laphonza Butler (D-Calif.).


This bill was never popular, not at any point in its life.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy