Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: We Don't Know Who We're Deporting
Date: 03/19/25 2:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
And those were all part of the border bill that the GOP rejected. Which is why folks keep pointing out that it was self-defeating for the GOP to torpedo it, when it would have increased those resources.

Wasn't self-defeating, as Trump is sitting in the White House and we have a secure border now.
BTW, what's not being mentioned here is the wink-and-a-nod nature of this law that Biden and/or a theoretical President Harris would have used it for.

He/She wouldn't have done a damn thing to lock the border down until the 5k/day limit hit. Then he/she may have done something about it. But mostly likely not. Meanwhile, the enhanced processing resources would have been waving the illegals right on through on an expedited basis.

All the while Harris/Biden would have gotten to tout their bipartisan border bill and look how awesome it is that we're solving the problem.

The thing is...that bill solved the democrats' political problem. Nothing more.


So, no. Not self defeating. The first rule of any legislation that has broad support from democrats is to question the premise of said legislation and reason out what they really want it for. In this case, Biden and/or Harris would have used it to effectively codify 1.8M illegals into the country year after year.

Blowing up that bill meant the United States dodged a bullet; we were 100000% correct on this score.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Dope1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (112) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community