Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: A counter-punch at the Fed
Date: 02/19/26 3:03 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 17
The White House has taken yet another shot at the Fed, with Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, saying that the central bank’s economists should be “disciplined” for publishing a report showing US businesses and consumers are bearing the bulk of the costs from Trump’s tariffs.

The study, released last week, suggested they paid nearly 90 per cent of the cost of Trump’s tariffs in 2025, with the burden decreasing slightly as the year progressed.

Hassett, a close adviser to Trump who had been a frontrunner to be the central bank’s next chair, yesterday described the recent report from the New York Fed as “an embarrassment” and argued that it failed to portray the full breadth of Trump’s levies.

“It’s I think the worst paper I’ve ever seen in the history of the Federal Reserve system,” Hassett told CNBC on Wednesday. “The people associated with this paper should presumably be disciplined.”

He added: “What they’ve done is they’ve put out a conclusion which has created a lot of news that’s highly partisan based on analysis that wouldn’t be accepted in a first semester econ[omics] class.”

This is the latest attack from the White House against the Federal Reserve, an independent federal agency that the Trump administration has been criticizing and targeting for months

I find it ironic that the same people who say that China will pay billions of dollars in tariffs and that tariffs are not simply a sales tax say the Fed analysis wouldn’t be accepted in a first semester econ[omics] class.”

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community