Post #19796 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Short sighted and wrong, as usual. Putin wouldn't have given up on the effect Trump was having on NATO...

Yep. I was debating whether it was worth responding to his lengthy list of errors, but I think you picked a good summary point. It wouldn't benefit Putin until Trump was out. Until then, Trump was doing too much to help Putin (and I'll say "unintentionally", even if I don't think that is determined definitively). Once Biden was in, Trump was of no further use. And associating Biden with his invasion didn't hurt Putin at all (probably helped).

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.