Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of TaxBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of TaxBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Tax Strategies
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: richinmd   😊 😞
Number: of 80 
Subject: Re: Inherited IRA
Date: 01/08/24 9:24 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1

Designated beneficiary (not an eligible designated beneficiary)

Follow the 10-year rule

10-year rule: If a beneficiary is subject to the 10-year rule,

Empty the entire account by the end of the 10th year following the year of the account owner's (or eligible designated beneficiary's) death
Relief under Notice 2022-53 for beneficiaries subject to the 10-year rule
The IRS will not treat a beneficiary of an inherited account in a plan or IRA who was subject to the 10-year rule and who failed to take an RMD for 2021 and 2022 as having failed to take the correct RMD

There's nothing in there about needing to take RMDs, even if the decedent had already started them.

I wish ptheland or aj485 or Ira were here.

Eric Hines


You definitely have to take the distributions yearly (but see below). I went through this confusion a few years ago when I passed away and talked to some very knowledgeable people at the bogleheads forum.

You are correct in noting that the IRS has decided to avoid penalizing anyone who has yet to take RMDs. No one knows whether that will continue, or whether they will allow the 10 years to be extended. If not then a person could find themselves having to take the money out over a shorter period of time which could hurt them tax wise.

No idea why they can't issue a final ruling on this. For me I'm doing the RMDs since I want to transfer the money prior to us (my wife and I) starting social security. Currently we can control our income the next few years, then a couple of small pensions kick in, and then social security.

Morningstar (no paywall for these) had a couple of good articles on this.
morningstar.com - Clearing up inherited ira confusion
morningstar.com - How year rmd rules work inherited iras

Of course this seems to constantly change as:
morningstar.com - Inherited rules are evolving and other retirement changes beginning this year

This (inherited RMDs) used to apply to both IRA and Roths but apparently now it does not.

And this morningstar article had some examples of how this works (for non-spouses):
morningstar.com - Who does doesnt get skip rmds under new year rule

So if it pays to wait, maybe you can continue to do so until the IRS gets to a real final decision.

Rich
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to richinmd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
Tax Strategies FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Tax | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community