Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! | How To Invest
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (84) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 77792 
Subject: Re: Vance Failed. No Deal.
Date: 04/13/26 2:53 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Why would the Saudis do that, vs loading at the Saudi port on the Red Sea, and pocket the port fees themselves?

Easier to serve their customers in Europe, as a pipeline that sticks out at the Med means shorter transit for tankers. You don't even need the Suez canal (another potential choke point).

The Red Sea terminal is better served for their customers in Asia.

So US reserves are depleted faster.

Bear in mind over time Venezuela also comes back online.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (84) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds