Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: the new BLS person pays off
Date: 09/09/25 12:31 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2

The more likely explanation is that the job numbers were always lower and they're just now coming out. Biden's economy was...rather meh. His gravity-defying job numbers never made sense.

When I first saw that piece on Yahoo Finance, I did a post, with a graph of the last 20+ years of "job creation". Putting the numbers in context, what we are seeing is a reversion to the mean, not a depression.

Remember, in 2020, Trump talking about the post plague economy will roar, due to "pent up demand"? There was a temporary bump in "jobs", to fill that "pent up demand". "Jobs" are now returning to the mean, with maybe a little overshoot to the downside, because the "JCs" are seeing the straight line rise to infinity they were projecting fail.

This graph shows what I'm talking about.

eyeonhousing.org - Wp content

Going forward, we could see even less "job creation", because the "JCs" can't find anyone to take their jobs, due to no-one being allowed into the country, combined with the government running as many people out of the country at they can. Knowing they can't find people to fill their "jobs", many "jobs" will be automated, or not done at all. The guest on Yahoo, said the new norm could be 30,000/month, with some months in 2026-27 showing no job growth at all. As suggested before, I think the Medicaid work requirement is a forced labor scheme, to force people to work/work more hours, to ease the transition to no immigrant labor. When a similar work requirement was pushed in Michigan a few years ago, the bill's sponsors said, openly, it was a forced labor scheme. A metro Detroit County Prosecutor has proposed another forced labor scheme for certain offenders.

Steve

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community