Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |
Author: albaby1 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 48473 
Subject: Re: "blatantly" unconstitutional
Date: 01/23/2025 4:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
Hmm. Does the 1st Amendment only apply to women? Or the 4th, or the 2nd or the 6th?

What do women who are American citizens have in common with men who are American citizens? Welp, they're both American citizens.


Right. The 14th Amendment does not, by its terms, apply only to American citizens. The whole point of it was to apply to the children of people who weren't American citizens, like slaves.

The 14th Amendment does not distinguish between people who crossed the border lawfully or unlawfully - just whether they are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Which people physically present in the U.S. almost exclusively are, including people who crossed the border unlawfully or overstayed their visa or are here on a green card.

He's a Seattle judge. Reagan also didn't have the Federalist Society IIRC back then telling him not to nominate This or That person.

He's also not a Democratic appointee, as you wrongly speculated in your post.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (61) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds