Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Clintonites lost bigly
Date: 06/11/26 4:41 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Overall, voters support action to fight climate change, but it's near the very bottom of what they think is important. But it's very important to the Clintonite, college-educated mostly-white liberal wing of the party. So that's what got in.

But that's a separate issue from what we were discussing. You had said that there were those that felt that dealing with racism and civil rights was priority one, and others felt that dealing with class (and, by extension, economic inequality) was the way to go. You're now introducing a third group that didn't value either approach?

I certainly place climate change has hyper-important. But people have to be secure first before you can try to push that. And they aren't secure, and haven't been since at least 2016. Obama made some headway with the ACA (in terms of making people feel more secure). Chasing climate change isn't going to do that**. And neither is trying to dismantle the ACA, give more tax breaks to the rich, shake confidence in the government (which the Felon is going out of his way to do), and pretty much everything else going on right now.

IMO, Dems need to assure civil rights, rule of law (no matter who you are!), reducing income inequality, and, if we can link it to more jobs created, throw in some climate change. The jobs aspect of that would help personal security. Without it, that issue would probably lose a lot of votes.




**Accepting that it probably should, on some level, but people generally can't think that long-term. The payoff would be decades away, and people are feeling insecure right now.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (16) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community