Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84357 
Subject: Re: The Affordability Tour Kicks Off
Date: 12/18/25 6:11 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
How about Medicare being made as easy to use, for the doc, as the French system: swipe a person's national health card, type a few codes into the terminal, instead of having a room full of paper shufflers, and receive payment in a few moments, instead of weeks?

More from the net sifter. As offered before, feel free to provide data from any other credible source, if you don't like what the sifter says.


Again, not a should position. We're talking about what is.

Though I do feel the need to push back on your suggestion that all of these folks that aren't doctors or nurses are "paper shufflers." A quick trip over to the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that nearly all folks who work in the health care field are providing patient services (click to the second page):

bls.gov - Healthcare occupations in

The top four categories, which make up half of all such workers, are nurses, personal care assistants, nursing assistants, and physicians. Those are all folks that are providing patient care and services - we just have multiple different occupational classifications for the people who provide, say, 'nursing care.' So too with categories like "home health aide" and "licensed practical and licensed vocational nurses" and "medical assistants" and "nurse practitioners" The differences you think exist between our utilization and countries like France is almost certainly just an artifact of how we license and categorize our workers, and not that a huge number of our health care industry workers are "paper shufflers." These are people that are providing patient services, not just moving paper around.

There are two categories of workers in the top 25 that appear to be clerical: "medical records specialists" and "other healthcare support workers," but they're fewer than 400K in total, or only a few percentage points of all workers.

Not that this is great - it's probably not ideal that we have so much of our patient care provided by people who are "personal care assistants" or "nursing assistants" rather than actual nurses, either because it's cheaper to do that than to call them nurses or because it's cheaper to use people that aren't trained to be nurses for patient care. But it's not like half our health care system is made up of folks doing nothing but paperwork.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (133) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community