Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: New power: Company over investors
Date: 03/02/26 8:48 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
reuters.com - Trumps SEC gave companies more power over investors lawsuits pushed them back

A new federal approach giving U.S. companies more say over which proposals shareholders can vote on at their annual meetings is creating regulatory uncertainty and leading to litigation, activists said.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in November changed its traditional process of having staff sign off before a company rejected votes on shareholder proposals. Instead it gave executives more discretion to pick which resolutions would appear on their proxy statements, the mandated document issued before shareholder meetings.

The change has prompted at least three investor lawsuits - against AT&T (T.N), opens new tab, Axon Enterprises (AXON.O), opens new tab and PepsiCo (PEP.O), opens new tab - and potentially more to follow. By stepping back, the SEC injected uncertainty into the engagement process, said Giovanna Eichner, shareholder advocate at Green Century Capital Management, a climate-focused Boston asset manager.
"More than anything, this lack of structure and rules is actually just leaving everyone unsure about the best way to move forward," Eichner said.

An SEC spokesman declined to comment. A person familiar with the agency's thinking said in November the change was driven partly to save staff time.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community