Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Vote Republican, cut ACA
Date: 02/02/26 6:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Pretty sure Dems want that, too. So, the Reps want different solutions to that problem, or they misidentify the problem. Yes?

Not really. Sure, Democrats want price transparency and efficiency - after all, who wouldn't? But that's not really something they diagnose as the source of the problems of health care. If everyone had perfect knowledge of all prices offered by all healthcare providers and all such services could be purchased with pretty high levels of efficiency, it wouldn't provide universal access to health care.

"Friction" is a huge problem, IMO. For example, IMO, putting insurance companies between me and my provider is a friction. Those companies expect to get paid. And many of them report to shareholders, which means a P&L statement that better be more P than L. So, the shareholders expect to get paid, too.

Sure, in much the same way that car insurance companies get between you and your mechanic. Just far more often, because we deliberately run nearly all of our routine health care through insurance companies for tax purposes. But that's not really the friction that the GOP is concerned with.

Didn't Reagan get the tort reform rolling in the 80s?

A little, but most Republicans believe it's still a massive problem, and a source of significant savings to be had.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (64) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community